SENTHILKUMAR vs RAVI — 14/2026

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11(2),ORDER 21 RULE 22,ORDER 21 RULE 37,ORDER 21 RULE 38,SECTION 55. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTV030000222026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-01-2026

Filing Number

22/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11(2),ORDER 21 RULE 22,ORDER 21 RULE 37,ORDER 21 RULE 38,SECTION 55

Petitioner(s)

SENTHILKUMAR

Adv. AYYAPPAN S.R.

Respondent(s)

RAVI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

15-04-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

13-03-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

15-04-2026
Deposition
15-04-2026
Deposition

Summary of Case 14/2026 (EP.14/2026 in OS.38/2023) This is a procedural order from the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, dated 15.04.2026, regarding witness examination under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court recorded the witness statement of Nalsami (son of Muthusami) and certified that the typed deposition was recorded in the judge's presence, under his direction, and admitted by the witness as correct. The document reflects completion of witness examination formalities but does not indicate a final judgment on the substantive case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 14/2026 (EP.14/2026 in OS.38/2023) This is a procedural order from the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, dated 15.04.2026, regarding witness examination under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court recorded the witness statement of Nalsami (son of Muthusami) and certified that the typed deposition was recorded in the judge's presence, under his direction, and admitted by the witness as correct. The document reflects completion of witness examination formalities but does not indicate a final judgment on the substantive case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case