RAJENDRAN vs MANIKANDAN — 88/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd July 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV020058562024

Filing Number

108/2024

Filing Date

06-Nov-2024

Registration No

88/2024

Registration Date

22-Nov-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

02-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANIKANDAN

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 25-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 03-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The court decided that vehicle TN 51 AP 3496, being a permit-less vehicle without proper authorization, does not require a permit under Motor Vehicles Act section 4. The petitioner's cross-examination argument was recorded and acknowledged by the court on June 3, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 26-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 08-May-2026

    Issues

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 04-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 04-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 04-May-2026

    Restored

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 04-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  17. 08-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 05-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 27-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 19-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 12-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 08-May-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 24-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 15-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 24-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 17-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 08-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 20-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 13-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 30-Jan-2025

    Publication

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 23-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 06-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 19-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 22-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 06-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided that vehicle TN 51 AP 3496, being a permit-less vehicle without proper authorization, does not require a permit under Motor Vehicles Act section 4. The petitioner's cross-examination argument was recorded and acknowledged by the court on June 3, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case