ICICI BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. SAJITH BABUP vs Praveena Jewellery House Represented by Proprietor Mary Praveena A — 285/2026

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV020036942025

e-Filing Number

22-11-2025

Filing Number

3556/2025

Filing Date

24-Nov-2025

Registration No

285/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER MR. SAJITH BABUP

    Adv. P VEERAMALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Praveena Jewellery House Represented by Proprietor Mary Praveena A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Praveena Jewellery House The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur allowed ICICI Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a property loan with outstanding dues of Rs. 1,09,06,903.78 as of November 13, 2025, despite receiving statutory demand and possession notices under SARFAESI Act Sections 13(2) and 13(4). The court found the bank had complied with all procedural requirements and appointed Advocate V. Ramji as Commissioner to take possession of the scheduled property in Mannarkudi with police assistance, directing execution within 60 days and fixing the commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-May-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-May-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ICICI Bank Limited v. Praveena Jewellery House The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur allowed ICICI Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a property loan with outstanding dues of Rs. 1,09,06,903.78 as of November 13, 2025, despite receiving statutory demand and possession notices under SARFAESI Act Sections 13(2) and 13(4). The court found the bank had complied with all procedural requirements and appointed Advocate V. Ramji as Commissioner to take possession of the scheduled property in Mannarkudi with police assistance, directing execution within 60 days and fixing the commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case