AXIS BANK LIMITED Represented by its Authorised officer Mr Devakirubai Daniel vs Mr A RAJENDRAN — 288/2026

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV020036922025

e-Filing Number

22-11-2025

Filing Number

3554/2025

Filing Date

24-Nov-2025

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LIMITED Represented by its Authorised officer Mr Devakirubai Daniel

    Adv. P VEERAMALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr A RAJENDRAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 288/2026 The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur granted Axis Bank's petition to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents defaulted on their property loan, and the bank complied with SARFAESI Act requirements by issuing demand and possession notices. The court found the bank entitled to possession and appointed Advocate P. Thiyagarajan as Commissioner to seize the property, with force if necessary, within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-May-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 288/2026 The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur granted Axis Bank's petition to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of mortgaged property. The respondents defaulted on their property loan, and the bank complied with SARFAESI Act requirements by issuing demand and possession notices. The court found the bank entitled to possession and appointed Advocate P. Thiyagarajan as Commissioner to seize the property, with force if necessary, within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case