EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS AUTHOURISED OFFICER MR. S. SANTHOSH vs Ragul — 78/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV020035312025
e-Filing Number
23-10-2025
Filing Number
3415/2025
Filing Date
06-11-2025
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
FIR Details
Police Station
NANNILAM P.S.,
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS AUTHOURISED OFFICER MR. S. SANTHOSH
Adv. RANJITH N.
Respondent(s)
Ragul
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
Orders
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 03-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 23-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 02-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. v. Ragul (78/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting it possession of mortgaged property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 2,50,000 loan with Rs. 1,64,208 outstanding as of July 9, 2024. The court found the bank complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the scheduled property in Velangudi with police assistance, fixing the Commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. v. Ragul (78/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting it possession of mortgaged property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 2,50,000 loan with Rs. 1,64,208 outstanding as of July 9, 2024. The court found the bank complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the scheduled property in Velangudi with police assistance, fixing the Commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts