EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS AUTHOURISED OFFICER MR.G. MURUGAN vs UMESH — 343/2026

Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV020015042026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

1454/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

343/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD REP BY ITS AUTHOURISED OFFICER MR.G. MURUGAN

    Adv. Jahabar sadiq

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UMESH

  2. 2.Thamilselvi

  3. 3.Vijaykumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002, finding that the respondents defaulted on a property loan of Rs. 7,32,172 and failed to repay despite demand and possession notices issued in compliance with statutory requirements. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the mortgaged property in Nunakkadu village with police assistance, directing completion within 60 days and fixing the Commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 27-May-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-May-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002, finding that the respondents defaulted on a property loan of Rs. 7,32,172 and failed to repay despite demand and possession notices issued in compliance with statutory requirements. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the mortgaged property in Nunakkadu village with police assistance, directing completion within 60 days and fixing the Commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case