City Union Bank Limited Muthupet Branch Rep by Its The Authorized Officer Mr. Kumar vs Rajadurai — 287/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 11th June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV020013712026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2026
Filing Number
1321/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
287/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.City Union Bank Limited Muthupet Branch Rep by Its The Authorized Officer Mr. Kumar
Adv. Saravanan V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajadurai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 287/2026 Summary City Union Bank Limited sought court assistance to take physical possession of mortgaged property after respondents Rajadurai and his wife failed to repay a property loan of Rs. 31,76,644. The bank had issued statutory demand and possession notices under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 in January and March 2024, which the respondents ignored. The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the petition and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged residential property in Thiruvarur District, with police assistance if needed, fixing the commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 287/2026
Case 287/2026 Summary City Union Bank Limited sought court assistance to take physical possession of mortgaged property after respondents Rajadurai and his wife failed to repay a property loan of Rs. 31,76,644. The bank had issued statutory demand and possession notices under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 in January and March 2024, which the respondents ignored. The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the petition and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged residential property in Thiruvarur District, with police assistance if needed, fixing the commissioner's fee at Rs. 30,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts