Thenmozhi Alias Jayapriya vs Sasikumar — 13/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MC - Maintenance Case

CNR: TNTV020013302025

Filing Number

1298/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

09-Jun-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thenmozhi Alias Jayapriya

    Adv. Thiru.G.T.Mani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sasikumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Tiruvarur Family Court ordered the defendant (husband) to pay Rs. 10,000 monthly maintenance to the plaintiffs (wife and 6-year-old daughter) for their food, clothing, medical care, and living expenses, effective from the date of petition filing. The court found that the defendant has a duty to support both plaintiffs based on evidence of their valid marriage in 2018 and the defendant's ability to earn through tailoring work, despite his claim of disability from speech impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 28-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 23-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 23-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 01-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 20-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 09-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Tiruvarur Family Court ordered the defendant (husband) to pay Rs. 10,000 monthly maintenance to the plaintiffs (wife and 6-year-old daughter) for their food, clothing, medical care, and living expenses, effective from the date of petition filing. The court found that the defendant has a duty to support both plaintiffs based on evidence of their valid marriage in 2018 and the defendant's ability to earn through tailoring work, despite his claim of disability from speech impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case