CCIW Thiruvarur vs Manivel — 75/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 408,465,468,477A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV020008782025

Filing Number

851/2025

Filing Date

26-Dec-2022

Registration No

75/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

CCIWCID TIRUVARUR

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 408,465,468,477A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CCIW Thiruvarur

    Adv. APP Gr.II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manivel

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 25-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 20-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C. No. 75/2025 In this case before the Thiruvarur District Court, the petitioner (CCIW Thiruvarur) challenged the respondent Manivel regarding alleged misappropriation of agricultural flood relief compensation of ₹54,544. The court examined evidence including signatures in cooperative society records and savings account ledgers. The court found gaps in the savings account ledger entries (ending on 21.10.2016 with no continuation noted) and determined the evidence was insufficient to establish the respondent's liability. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 03-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 25-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 30-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 16-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 26-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 18-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 20-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 22-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 26-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 75/2025 In this case before the Thiruvarur District Court, the petitioner (CCIW Thiruvarur) challenged the respondent Manivel regarding alleged misappropriation of agricultural flood relief compensation of ₹54,544. The court examined evidence including signatures in cooperative society records and savings account ledgers. The court found gaps in the savings account ledger entries (ending on 21.10.2016 with no continuation noted) and determined the evidence was insufficient to establish the respondent's liability. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case