CCIW CID Thiruvarur vs Dhinakaran — 67/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,468,420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV020008662025

Filing Number

839/2025

Filing Date

01-Jun-2018

Registration No

67/2025

Registration Date

01-Jun-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

CCIWCID TIRUVARUR

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,468,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CCIW CID (Criminal Investigation Department) Thiruvarur

    Adv. APP Gr.II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhinakaran

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 67/2025 Outcome: The court found respondent Dhinakaran guilty of embezzling Rs. 64,64,531/- from the cooperative society's funds through fraudulent accounting entries and improper financial management. The case is an ongoing criminal investigation into financial irregularities at an agricultural cooperative society in Thiruvarur, with the court documenting evidence of misappropriated funds, false vouchers, and falsified records across 17 identified schemes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 14-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 29-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 26-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 11-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 04-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 27-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 12-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 08-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 17-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 03-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 07-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 25-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 06-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 20-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 29-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 21-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 01-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 67/2025 Outcome: The court found respondent Dhinakaran guilty of embezzling Rs. 64,64,531/- from the cooperative society's funds through fraudulent accounting entries and improper financial management. The case is an ongoing criminal investigation into financial irregularities at an agricultural cooperative society in Thiruvarur, with the court documenting evidence of misappropriated funds, false vouchers, and falsified records across 17 identified schemes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case