CCIWCID vs Dhinakaran — 63/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,468,47(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV020008622025
Filing Number
835/2025
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
63/2025
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
CCIWCID TIRUVARUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CCIWCID
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 63/2025 Case: C.C. No. 63/2025 | Date: 24.06.2026 | Court: Tiruvarur Petitioner: CCIWCID | Respondent: Dhinakaran The court found that respondent Dhinakaran misappropriated ₹64,64,531 from the cooperative society's funds through fraudulent entries and unauthorized payments. Specifically, he falsely recorded that two administrative committee members (P.B. Sathiyamurthy and S. Marvi) received attendance allowances of ₹100 each on 25.07.2013 when they did not attend the meeting and did not receive payment. Their own testimony confirmed they neither attended nor received the amounts. The court documented systematic embezzlement across 17 transaction categories involving fraudulent ledger entries, unauthorized cash disbursements, and forged documentation. The case was recorded and admitted under Section 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1969, with findings establishing criminal misappropriation by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2025
Summary of Case 63/2025 Case: C.C. No. 63/2025 | Date: 24.06.2026 | Court: Tiruvarur Petitioner: CCIWCID | Respondent: Dhinakaran The court found that respondent Dhinakaran misappropriated ₹64,64,531 from the cooperative society's funds through fraudulent entries and unauthorized payments. Specifically, he falsely recorded that two administrative committee members (P.B. Sathiyamurthy and S. Marvi) received attendance allowances of ₹100 each on 25.07.2013 when they did not attend the meeting and did not receive payment. Their own testimony confirmed they neither attended nor received the amounts. The court documented systematic embezzlement across 17 transaction categories involving fraudulent ledger entries, unauthorized cash disbursements, and forged documentation. The case was recorded and admitted under Section 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1969, with findings establishing criminal misappropriation by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts