CC IW CID Thiruvarur vs Dhinakaran — 59/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,468,477(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV020008572025
Filing Number
830/2025
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CC IW CID (Criminal Investigation Department) Thiruvarur
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran
-
2.Kumar
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 59/2025 Court: Taluq Court, Thiruvarur Date: June 24, 2026 Petitioner: CC IW CID Thiruvarur Respondents: Dhinakaran and Kumar The court found evidence of embezzlement of Rs. 64,64,531/- from cooperative society funds through falsified financial records and unauthorized cash disbursements. The court documented that two society members (P.P. Sathiyamurthy and S. Manivannan) were falsely credited with attendance allowances of Rs. 100 each on July 25, 2013, despite not participating in the administrative committee meeting, resulting in Rs. 200/- fraudulent withdrawal. Witness testimonies and documentary evidence confirmed the embezzlement scheme involving forged ledger entries and unauthorized fund transfers. The court admitted multiple pieces of evidence into the record establishing the financial misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2025
Summary of Case 59/2025 Court: Taluq Court, Thiruvarur Date: June 24, 2026 Petitioner: CC IW CID Thiruvarur Respondents: Dhinakaran and Kumar The court found evidence of embezzlement of Rs. 64,64,531/- from cooperative society funds through falsified financial records and unauthorized cash disbursements. The court documented that two society members (P.P. Sathiyamurthy and S. Manivannan) were falsely credited with attendance allowances of Rs. 100 each on July 25, 2013, despite not participating in the administrative committee meeting, resulting in Rs. 200/- fraudulent withdrawal. Witness testimonies and documentary evidence confirmed the embezzlement scheme involving forged ledger entries and unauthorized fund transfers. The court admitted multiple pieces of evidence into the record establishing the financial misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts