CCIWCID Thiruvarur vs Dhinakaran — 58/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV020008562025
Filing Number
829/2025
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
CCIWCID TIRUVARUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CCIWCID Thiruvarur
Adv. APP Gr. II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran
-
2.Suresh
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 58/2025 Court: Taluk Court, Thiruvarur Date: 24.06.2026 Judge: Dr. R. (M.A., M.L., Ph.D.) Parties: CCIWCID Thiruvarur (Petitioner) vs. Dhinakaran and Suresh (Respondents) Outcome: The court, after examining evidence and witness testimonies, found that respondent Dhinakaran (society manager) embezzled ₹64,64,531 from the cooperative society funds through fraudulent entries in 17 different transaction categories. Key findings include falsely recording attendance allowances (₹200) paid to two members (P. Sathyamurthy and S. Marviolet) who did not attend meetings, and maintaining irregular cashbooks. The court admitted 14 documentary exhibits and witness statements (11 pages from secretary M. Suresh) establishing the financial misconduct. The case proceeded on merits with findings recorded against the respondents for misappropriation of society funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2025
Case Summary: C.C. No. 58/2025 Court: Taluk Court, Thiruvarur Date: 24.06.2026 Judge: Dr. R. (M.A., M.L., Ph.D.) Parties: CCIWCID Thiruvarur (Petitioner) vs. Dhinakaran and Suresh (Respondents) Outcome: The court, after examining evidence and witness testimonies, found that respondent Dhinakaran (society manager) embezzled ₹64,64,531 from the cooperative society funds through fraudulent entries in 17 different transaction categories. Key findings include falsely recording attendance allowances (₹200) paid to two members (P. Sathyamurthy and S. Marviolet) who did not attend meetings, and maintaining irregular cashbooks. The court admitted 14 documentary exhibits and witness statements (11 pages from secretary M. Suresh) establishing the financial misconduct. The case proceeded on merits with findings recorded against the respondents for misappropriation of society funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts