CCIW CID Thiruvarur vs Dhinakaran — 56/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,468,420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV020008542025
Filing Number
827/2025
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
CCIWCID TIRUVARUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CCIW CID (Criminal Investigation Department) Thiruvarur
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 56/2025 Court: District Court, Thiruvarur Date: 24.06.2026 Judge: Dr. R. (M.A., M.L., Ph.D.) This case involved an investigation by CCIW CID Thiruvarur against Dhinakaran regarding financial irregularities in a cooperative agricultural society. The court found evidence of embezzlement totaling Rs. 64,64,531/- through fraudulent cash transactions and falsified records. Key findings included: (1) false attestation of Rs. 200/- paid to two officials (P.P. Sathiyamurthy and S. Morvizhi) who did not attend a July 25, 2013 administrative meeting; (2) misappropriation of funds through unauthorized ledger entries; and (3) failure to maintain proper double-entry accounting records. Witness statements corroborated the fraudulent entries, and documentary evidence established systematic financial misconduct across 17 transaction items. The court recorded detailed findings against the respondent for criminal breach of trust and embezzlement of society funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 56/2025 Court: District Court, Thiruvarur Date: 24.06.2026 Judge: Dr. R. (M.A., M.L., Ph.D.) This case involved an investigation by CCIW CID Thiruvarur against Dhinakaran regarding financial irregularities in a cooperative agricultural society. The court found evidence of embezzlement totaling Rs. 64,64,531/- through fraudulent cash transactions and falsified records. Key findings included: (1) false attestation of Rs. 200/- paid to two officials (P.P. Sathiyamurthy and S. Morvizhi) who did not attend a July 25, 2013 administrative meeting; (2) misappropriation of funds through unauthorized ledger entries; and (3) failure to maintain proper double-entry accounting records. Witness statements corroborated the fraudulent entries, and documentary evidence established systematic financial misconduct across 17 transaction items. The court recorded detailed findings against the respondent for criminal breach of trust and embezzlement of society funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts