CCIW CID Thiruvarur vs Dhinakaran — 55/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,460,420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV020008532025
Filing Number
826/2025
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
CCIWCID TIRUVARUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CCIW CID (Criminal Investigation Department) Thiruvarur
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case 55/2025 Summary CCIW CID Thiruvarur v. Dhinakaran - Criminal Case heard on 24.06.2026 The court found that respondent Dhinakaran, as secretary of an agricultural cooperative society, fraudulently misappropriated ₹64,64,531 from society funds through falsified vouchers, forged meeting minutes, and unauthorized cash book entries between 2013-2015. The court determined that two committee members (P. Sathyamurthy and S. Marvi) did not attend a 25.07.2013 meeting but were falsely recorded as present and paid ₹100 each without authorization. Dhinakaran admitted embezzling ₹200 and failed to ensure proper financial record-keeping by subordinate staff. Comprehensive documentary evidence (meeting minutes, cash books, ledgers, audit reports) was examined and admitted as exhibits demonstrating systematic financial fraud and negligence in fund management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2025
Case 55/2025 Summary CCIW CID Thiruvarur v. Dhinakaran - Criminal Case heard on 24.06.2026 The court found that respondent Dhinakaran, as secretary of an agricultural cooperative society, fraudulently misappropriated ₹64,64,531 from society funds through falsified vouchers, forged meeting minutes, and unauthorized cash book entries between 2013-2015. The court determined that two committee members (P. Sathyamurthy and S. Marvi) did not attend a 25.07.2013 meeting but were falsely recorded as present and paid ₹100 each without authorization. Dhinakaran admitted embezzling ₹200 and failed to ensure proper financial record-keeping by subordinate staff. Comprehensive documentary evidence (meeting minutes, cash books, ledgers, audit reports) was examined and admitted as exhibits demonstrating systematic financial fraud and negligence in fund management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts