SIVAKUMAR vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CYBER CRIME PS, TIRUVARUR — 175/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV020007242026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
699/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
001007
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, TIRUVARUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIVAKUMAR
Adv. GNANASEKARAN A
Respondent(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CYBER CRIME PS (Police Station), TIRUVARUR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
Enquiry
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner Sivakumar's petition to recover Rs. 20,276/- that was frozen in a suspect bank account during a cyber crime investigation (CSR No. 1007/2025). The court directed the Bank of Maharastra to defreeze and transfer the amount to the petitioner's account, since the petitioner had transferred Rs. 99,999/- to that suspect account and was entitled to recovery of the frozen funds corresponding to his transaction. The release was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioner to execute a bond, file an affidavit confirming receipt, and deposit the amount if claimed by another person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner Sivakumar's petition to recover Rs. 20,276/- that was frozen in a suspect bank account during a cyber crime investigation (CSR No. 1007/2025). The court directed the Bank of Maharastra to defreeze and transfer the amount to the petitioner's account, since the petitioner had transferred Rs. 99,999/- to that suspect account and was entitled to recovery of the frozen funds corresponding to his transaction. The release was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioner to execute a bond, file an affidavit confirming receipt, and deposit the amount if claimed by another person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts