EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED V VIJAYAVIGNESH vs ANBARASAN M — 150/2026

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 13th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV020006082026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-02-2026

Filing Number

586/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED V VIJAYAVIGNESH

Adv. SATHIYARAJ M

Respondent(s)

ANBARASAN M

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Orders

24-02-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Anbarasan The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur, allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 1,50,000, with outstanding dues of Rs. 2,82,306 as of January 21, 2026. The bank had complied with statutory requirements by issuing demand notices under Section 13(2) in October 2024 and possession notices under Section 13(4) in February 2025, with newspaper publication. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the 3,357 sq.ft. property in Melathichamangalam, Thiruvarur District, with police assistance if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Anbarasan The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvarur, allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a mortgaged property. The respondents had defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 1,50,000, with outstanding dues of Rs. 2,82,306 as of January 21, 2026. The bank had complied with statutory requirements by issuing demand notices under Section 13(2) in October 2024 and possession notices under Section 13(4) in February 2025, with newspaper publication. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the 3,357 sq.ft. property in Melathichamangalam, Thiruvarur District, with police assistance if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case