REPCO HOME FINANCE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER V GOMATHISANKAR vs MANIKANDAN — 131/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 17th June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV020000312026
e-Filing Number
24-12-2025
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
131/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.REPCO HOME FINANCE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER V GOMATHISANKAR
Adv. GNANASEKARAN A
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANIKANDAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 131/2026 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed REPCO Home Finance Limited's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, appointing Advocate A. Premalatha as Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property in Tiruvarur. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a loan of Rs. 31,04,634, and REPCO complied with all statutory requirements under SARFAESI Act Sections 13(2) and 13(4) by issuing demand and possession notices with newspaper publications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 131/2026 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed REPCO Home Finance Limited's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, appointing Advocate A. Premalatha as Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property in Tiruvarur. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a loan of Rs. 31,04,634, and REPCO complied with all statutory requirements under SARFAESI Act Sections 13(2) and 13(4) by issuing demand and possession notices with newspaper publications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts