Sundaresh kumar vs Palani Advocate - Mr.N.Karthi — 45/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR 7, R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV010010562025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
229/2025
Filing Date
06-06-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
09-06-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sundaresh kumar
Adv. THIRU. R. SASIKUMAR
Respondent(s)
Palani Advocate - Mr.N.Karthi
Arunachalam
Adv. Mr. K.Sathishkumar
The District Collector
The District Registrar
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
List / Special List
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | List / Special List |
| 19-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
In O.S. No. 45/2025 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur, petitioner Sundaresh Kumar (age 40) filed an Original Suit under Section 44 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1969. The petitioner testified in court, affirmed his affidavit, and submitted seven documentary exhibits. The respondents (Advocate Mr. N. Karthi, Arunachalam, and The District Collector) raised objections to the marking of exhibits. The court, following precedent in AIR 2001 SC 1158 and principles of justice, proceeded to mark the exhibits. The case proceeded with examination-in-chief of the petitioner and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In O.S. No. 45/2025 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur, petitioner Sundaresh Kumar (age 40) filed an Original Suit under Section 44 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1969. The petitioner testified in court, affirmed his affidavit, and submitted seven documentary exhibits. The respondents (Advocate Mr. N. Karthi, Arunachalam, and The District Collector) raised objections to the marking of exhibits. The court, following precedent in AIR 2001 SC 1158 and principles of justice, proceeded to mark the exhibits. The case proceeded with examination-in-chief of the petitioner and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts