Sundaresh kumar vs Palani Advocate - Mr.N.Karthi — 45/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR 7, R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV010010562025

Evidence

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

229/2025

Filing Date

06-06-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

09-06-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR 7, R 1

Petitioner(s)

Sundaresh kumar

Adv. THIRU. R. SASIKUMAR

Respondent(s)

Palani Advocate - Mr.N.Karthi

Arunachalam

Adv. Mr. K.Sathishkumar

The District Collector

The District Registrar

The Sub Registrar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Evidence

30-01-2026

List / Special List

19-01-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Deposition

In O.S. No. 45/2025 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur, petitioner Sundaresh Kumar (age 40) filed an Original Suit under Section 44 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1969. The petitioner testified in court, affirmed his affidavit, and submitted seven documentary exhibits. The respondents (Advocate Mr. N. Karthi, Arunachalam, and The District Collector) raised objections to the marking of exhibits. The court, following precedent in AIR 2001 SC 1158 and principles of justice, proceeded to mark the exhibits. The case proceeded with examination-in-chief of the petitioner and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 45/2025 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur, petitioner Sundaresh Kumar (age 40) filed an Original Suit under Section 44 of the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1969. The petitioner testified in court, affirmed his affidavit, and submitted seven documentary exhibits. The respondents (Advocate Mr. N. Karthi, Arunachalam, and The District Collector) raised objections to the marking of exhibits. The court, following precedent in AIR 2001 SC 1158 and principles of justice, proceeded to mark the exhibits. The case proceeded with examination-in-chief of the petitioner and no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case