DEVID vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 439/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010009072026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

622/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

439/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

224

Police Station

THIRUTHURAIPOONDI P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C), 4(1-A)(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVID

    Adv. RAJESHKUMAR P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Devid, accused of possessing 10 liters of palm wine under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding the nature and gravity of the offense warranted release. The bail was conditioned on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding, with cancellation threatened for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Devid, accused of possessing 10 liters of palm wine under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding the nature and gravity of the offense warranted release. The bail was conditioned on executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding, with cancellation threatened for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case