SELVAKUMAR vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW THIRUTHURAIPOONDI — 435/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010009032026

Filing Number

618/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

435/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

113

Police Station

PEW,Thiruthuraipoondi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1-A)(ii), 4(1)(A)

Petitioner(s)

1.SELVAKUMAR

Adv. THIRU. G. GNANARAJ, M.Sc., B.L.,
2.Vignesh

Respondent(s)

1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW THIRUTHURAIPOONDI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
29-May-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Vacation Sessions Court, Thiruvarur dismissed the bail petition filed by Selvakumar and Vignesh under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court rejected their bail application for an alcohol smuggling case (Crime No. 113/2026) involving 1404 brandy bottles, citing pending investigation, multiple prior criminal cases against both accused, a proposed Goondas Act action, risks of witness tampering, and the gravity of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
29-May-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
26-May-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-May-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Vacation Sessions Court, Thiruvarur dismissed the bail petition filed by Selvakumar and Vignesh under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court rejected their bail application for an alcohol smuggling case (Crime No. 113/2026) involving 1404 brandy bottles, citing pending investigation, multiple prior criminal cases against both accused, a proposed Goondas Act action, risks of witness tampering, and the gravity of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.