PREMA vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW THIRUTHURAIPOONDI — 430/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 29th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV010009012026
Filing Number
616/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
430/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
113
Police Station
PEW,Thiruthuraipoondi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PREMA
Adv. THIRU. G. GNANARAJ, M.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEW THIRUTHURAIPOONDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 430/2026 - Prema v. Inspector of Police, PEW Thiruthuraipoondi The Vacation Sessions Court dismissed Prema's bail petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an alcohol possession case (Crime No. 113/2026) involving 1404 bottles of liquor under TNP Amendment Act 2024. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, premature investigation stage requiring chemical reports, pending previous cases against the petitioner, and prosecution's concerns about witness tampering and re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 430/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 430/2026 - Prema v. Inspector of Police, PEW Thiruthuraipoondi The Vacation Sessions Court dismissed Prema's bail petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an alcohol possession case (Crime No. 113/2026) involving 1404 bottles of liquor under TNP Amendment Act 2024. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offense, premature investigation stage requiring chemical reports, pending previous cases against the petitioner, and prosecution's concerns about witness tampering and re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts