SHARUK vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUGAVALNTHAN PS — 443/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV010008962026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
611/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
443/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
PERUGAVALNTHAN P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHARUK
Adv. Padmasuresh M
Respondent(s)
-
1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUGAVALNTHAN PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Court of Sessions Judge Tiruvarur granted anticipatory bail to 22-year-old Sharuk in Criminal Misc. Petition 443/2026, regarding allegations of assault with a wooden log, criminal intimidation, and harassment under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act section 4. The court found the injuries sufficiently minor (victim discharged from hospital) and the charges not serious enough to warrant arrest, but imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, no witness tampering, and no absconding, with breach triggering bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 443/2026
The Court of Sessions Judge Tiruvarur granted anticipatory bail to 22-year-old Sharuk in Criminal Misc. Petition 443/2026, regarding allegations of assault with a wooden log, criminal intimidation, and harassment under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act section 4. The court found the injuries sufficiently minor (victim discharged from hospital) and the charges not serious enough to warrant arrest, but imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, no witness tampering, and no absconding, with breach triggering bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts