SUMATHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 440/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010008942026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

609/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

440/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

THIRUTHURAIPOONDI P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMATHI

    Adv. RAJKUMAR S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 440/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sumathi, accused of assaulting someone with an Aruval (sickle) and using abusive language under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of the BNS Act. The court found the offense's gravity manageable given the injured party's hospital discharge and other case circumstances. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 29-May-2026

    Service Pending

    Principal District Judge

  5. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 440/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sumathi, accused of assaulting someone with an Aruval (sickle) and using abusive language under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of the BNS Act. The court found the offense's gravity manageable given the injured party's hospital discharge and other case circumstances. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case