SUMATHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 440/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV010008942026
e-Filing Number
26-05-2026
Filing Number
609/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
440/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
222
Police Station
THIRUTHURAIPOONDI P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMATHI
Adv. RAJKUMAR S
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 440/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sumathi, accused of assaulting someone with an Aruval (sickle) and using abusive language under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of the BNS Act. The court found the offense's gravity manageable given the injured party's hospital discharge and other case circumstances. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
29-May-2026
Service Pending
Principal District Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 440/2026
Case 440/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sumathi, accused of assaulting someone with an Aruval (sickle) and using abusive language under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of the BNS Act. The court found the offense's gravity manageable given the injured party's hospital discharge and other case circumstances. Bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts