TAMILSELVAM vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN PS, TIRUVARUR. — 429/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010008912026

Filing Number

606/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

429/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

TIRUVARUR TOWN P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(A), 4(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAMILSELVAM

    Adv. THIRU. M. PADMA SURESH

  2. 2.Sugumaran

  3. 3.Lakshmanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN PS (Police Station), TIRUVARUR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court granted bail to three accused (Tamilselvam, Sugumaran, and Lakshmanan) in an alcohol possession case under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, after they had been in judicial custody since May 14, 2026. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 15,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and prohibitions against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court granted bail to three accused (Tamilselvam, Sugumaran, and Lakshmanan) in an alcohol possession case under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, after they had been in judicial custody since May 14, 2026. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 15,000 bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and prohibitions against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case