DHIVAKAR vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUDAVASAL PS. — 428/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010008902026

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

428/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

425

Police Station

KUDAVASAL P.S.,

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 307, 506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIVAKAR

    Adv. THIRU. S. RAJKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUDAVASAL PS (Police Station).

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 428/2026 Summary: The Tiruvarur Sessions Court granted bail to Dhivakar, accused of offences under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 307, and 506(ii) in Crime 425/2021. Considering the period of incarceration and nature of offences, the court allowed the bail petition despite the prosecution's objection that the accused might abscond and commit similar offences. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and surrender of the original court pass. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 428/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 428/2026 Summary: The Tiruvarur Sessions Court granted bail to Dhivakar, accused of offences under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 307, and 506(ii) in Crime 425/2021. Considering the period of incarceration and nature of offences, the court allowed the bail petition despite the prosecution's objection that the accused might abscond and commit similar offences. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence, and surrender of the original court pass. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case