PUGAZHENTHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOOTHANALLUR PS, — 436/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010008872026

Filing Number

602/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

436/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

121

Police Station

KOOTHANALLUR P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUGAZHENTHI

    Adv. Thiru.S.Manikandan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOOTHANALLUR PS (Police Station),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 436/2026 The Vacation Sessions Judge granted bail to Pugazhenthi, accused of theft of sand without proper license under BNS 303(2) and Mines Act 21(1), considering his period of incarceration and offense gravity. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 1,500 non-refundable deposit to the District Mineral Foundation Trust, a Rs. 15,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 436/2026 The Vacation Sessions Judge granted bail to Pugazhenthi, accused of theft of sand without proper license under BNS 303(2) and Mines Act 21(1), considering his period of incarceration and offense gravity. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 1,500 non-refundable deposit to the District Mineral Foundation Trust, a Rs. 15,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and non-tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case