JAYASEELAN vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN PS, MANNARGUDI. — 433/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010008852026

Filing Number

600/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

433/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

214

Police Station

MANNARGUDI P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1-A)(ii), 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYASEELAN

    Adv. M. PADMASURESH

  2. 2.Pandiyarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN PS (Police Station), MANNARGUDI.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 433/2026 Summary: The Vacation Sessions Judge granted bail to Jayaseelan and Pandiyarajan, accused of illegally possessing alcohol under the TNP Amendment Act 2024, after they had been in judicial custody since May 13, 2026. The court allowed the bail petition considering the nature and gravity of the offense, imposing conditions including Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 433/2026 Summary: The Vacation Sessions Judge granted bail to Jayaseelan and Pandiyarajan, accused of illegally possessing alcohol under the TNP Amendment Act 2024, after they had been in judicial custody since May 13, 2026. The court allowed the bail petition considering the nature and gravity of the offense, imposing conditions including Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case