ANVARDEEN vs SPECIAL DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER (LA), KUMBAKONAM Advocate - THIRU. D. MANIVANNAN — 22/2022
Case under Landacquisitionact Section 51,52,(1),64(2B). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTV010005642022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
170/2022
Filing Date
29-03-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
06-04-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANVARDEEN
Adv. THIRU. A. AYYAPPAN
Respondent(s)
SPECIAL DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER (LA), KUMBAKONAM Advocate - THIRU. D. MANIVANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary In L.A.O.P. No.22/2022 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, the court examined the witness examination record and compensation awarded for land acquisition. The court confirmed that land compensation of ₹58,606.43 per sq.m for RS No.73/7B and ₹5,671.59 per sq.m for RS No.73/6, along with 100% solatium and 12% additional compensation totaling ₹43,62,957, was appropriately determined and deposited into the petitioner's bank account. The witness deposition was recorded and authenticated before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In L.A.O.P. No.22/2022 before the Principal District Court of Tiruvarur under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, the court examined the witness examination record and compensation awarded for land acquisition. The court confirmed that land compensation of ₹58,606.43 per sq.m for RS No.73/7B and ₹5,671.59 per sq.m for RS No.73/6, along with 100% solatium and 12% additional compensation totaling ₹43,62,957, was appropriately determined and deposited into the petitioner's bank account. The witness deposition was recorded and authenticated before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts