HAROON vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Muthupettai P.S — 210/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010004482026

Filing Number

311/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

210/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MUTHUPETTAI P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3)

Arms Act 1959 Section 25(1A)

Petitioner(s)

1.HAROON

Adv. THIRU. G. GNANARAJ, M.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Muthupettai P.S

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur granted bail to the accused Haroon in Criminal Case No. 34/2026 involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations. The court considered the duration of custody (since 08.02.2026), nature of offences, and other circumstances to allow the petition, despite the prosecution's objection citing the accused's criminal history and risk of witness tampering. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur granted bail to the accused Haroon in Criminal Case No. 34/2026 involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations. The court considered the duration of custody (since 08.02.2026), nature of offences, and other circumstances to allow the petition, despite the prosecution's objection citing the accused's criminal history and risk of witness tampering. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.