HAROON vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Muthupettai P.S — 210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV010004482026
Filing Number
311/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
210/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
MUTHUPETTAI P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAROON
Adv. THIRU. G. GNANARAJ, M.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Muthupettai P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur granted bail to the accused Haroon in Criminal Case No. 34/2026 involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations. The court considered the duration of custody (since 08.02.2026), nature of offences, and other circumstances to allow the petition, despite the prosecution's objection citing the accused's criminal history and risk of witness tampering. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur granted bail to the accused Haroon in Criminal Case No. 34/2026 involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations. The court considered the duration of custody (since 08.02.2026), nature of offences, and other circumstances to allow the petition, despite the prosecution's objection citing the accused's criminal history and risk of witness tampering. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts