REVATHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 214/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV010004442026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

308/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

KOTTUR P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 115(2), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.REVATHI

Adv. VIGNESH G
2.KEERTHIKA

Adv. VIGNESH G

Respondent(s)

1.STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Revathi and Keerthika in Crime 38/2026 (Kottur Police Station), who faced charges including wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault with a weapon. The court found the charges were rooted in previous enmity and noted the injured party had been discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite prosecution objections about witness tampering. Bail was granted with stringent conditions: each petitioner must execute Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, report daily to police for one month, refrain from tampering with evidence or absconding, and face cancellation or fresh charges for violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Revathi and Keerthika in Crime 38/2026 (Kottur Police Station), who faced charges including wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault with a weapon. The court found the charges were rooted in previous enmity and noted the injured party had been discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite prosecution objections about witness tampering. Bail was granted with stringent conditions: each petitioner must execute Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, report daily to police for one month, refrain from tampering with evidence or absconding, and face cancellation or fresh charges for violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.