REVATHI vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 214/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV010004442026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
308/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
214/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
REVATHI
Adv. VIGNESH G
KEERTHIKA
Adv. VIGNESH G
Respondent(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Revathi and Keerthika in Crime 38/2026 (Kottur Police Station), who faced charges including wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault with a weapon. The court found the charges were rooted in previous enmity and noted the injured party had been discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite prosecution objections about witness tampering. Bail was granted with stringent conditions: each petitioner must execute Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, report daily to police for one month, refrain from tampering with evidence or absconding, and face cancellation or fresh charges for violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Revathi and Keerthika in Crime 38/2026 (Kottur Police Station), who faced charges including wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and assault with a weapon. The court found the charges were rooted in previous enmity and noted the injured party had been discharged from hospital, warranting bail despite prosecution objections about witness tampering. Bail was granted with stringent conditions: each petitioner must execute Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, report daily to police for one month, refrain from tampering with evidence or absconding, and face cancellation or fresh charges for violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts