SARAVANAN vs SPECIAL DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER (LA), KUMBAKONAM Advocate - THIRU. D. MANIVANNAN — 11/2022

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 51,52,(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTV010003942022

Filing Number

121/2022

Filing Date

09-Mar-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

09-Mar-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 51,52,(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARAVANAN

    Adv. THIRU. G. GOPALAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SPECIAL DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER (LA), KUMBAKONAM Advocate - THIRU. D. MANIVANNAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: Saravanan v. Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition (L.A.O.P. 11/2022) Saravanan filed a land acquisition petition under sections 51, 52(1), and 64(2B) of the RFCTLARR Act 2013 seeking higher compensation for his 46 sq.mt. property (with building) acquired in Vandampalai Village, Tiruvarur District. The court dismissed the petition for default on March 13, 2026, as the claimant failed to file the required claim statement despite it being pending since September 2, 2022. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  9. 22-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  10. 03-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  11. 24-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  12. 11-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  13. 18-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  14. 21-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  15. 02-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  16. 16-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  17. 05-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  18. 09-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  19. 23-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  20. 26-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  21. 14-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  22. 01-Jul-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  23. 27-Jun-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  24. 09-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  25. 21-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  26. 17-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  27. 06-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  28. 28-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  29. 12-Nov-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  30. 20-Oct-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  31. 02-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  32. 08-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  33. 04-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  34. 10-Jun-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  35. 12-Apr-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  36. 09-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 09-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Saravanan v. Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition (L.A.O.P. 11/2022) Saravanan filed a land acquisition petition under sections 51, 52(1), and 64(2B) of the RFCTLARR Act 2013 seeking higher compensation for his 46 sq.mt. property (with building) acquired in Vandampalai Village, Tiruvarur District. The court dismissed the petition for default on March 13, 2026, as the claimant failed to file the required claim statement despite it being pending since September 2, 2022. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case