Sub Inspector of Police, Ambalur Ps vs Sandeep — 65/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,294(b),323506(2)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU090054112024
e-Filing Number
16-08-2024
Filing Number
5411/2024
Filing Date
01-09-2024
Registration No
65/2024
Registration Date
30-12-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
150
Police Station
AMBALUR POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Ambalur Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Sandeep
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Vaniyambadi Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons under IPC Sections 143, 294(b), 323, and 506(ii) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act Section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the victim's testimony and medical evidence were initially compelling, the accused persons' consistent denials during cross-examination, combined with contradictions in the prosecution witnesses' accounts, created sufficient doubt about their guilt, warranting their acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Vaniyambadi Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all five accused persons under IPC Sections 143, 294(b), 323, and 506(ii) and Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Publications Act Section 4, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while the victim's testimony and medical evidence were initially compelling, the accused persons' consistent denials during cross-examination, combined with contradictions in the prosecution witnesses' accounts, created sufficient doubt about their guilt, warranting their acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts