The si of police, Ambalur police station vs Thamizharasan — 492/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTU090008412026

Filing Number

841/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

492/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

AMBALUR POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The si of police, Ambalur police station

    Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thamizharasan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary - Case 492/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi allowed Tamilarasan's petition for interim custody of his seized Vivo Y295G mobile phone (IMEI: 862391078554334). Finding ownership undisputed and recognizing that prolonged police custody deteriorates property value, the court granted return of the phone subject to conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with surety, production on court order, photographic documentation with 65-B Certificate, and identification by counsel and police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 492/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary - Case 492/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi allowed Tamilarasan's petition for interim custody of his seized Vivo Y295G mobile phone (IMEI: 862391078554334). Finding ownership undisputed and recognizing that prolonged police custody deteriorates property value, the court granted return of the phone subject to conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with surety, production on court order, photographic documentation with 65-B Certificate, and identification by counsel and police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case