Town ps vs Riyaz — 378/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTU090006292026
Filing Number
629/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
378/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
386
Police Station
VANIYAMBADI TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Town ps (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Riyaz
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi dismissed Riyaz's petition seeking interim custody of his seized NS 200 Pulsar vehicle (Reg.No.TN 18 AW 3870) used in a theft case. The court rejected his plea citing his absence, failure to produce original ownership documents despite sufficient time, and the prosecution's need to retain the vehicle as material evidence to prove the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
09-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
07-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
06-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
05-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
04-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
02-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 378/2026
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Vaniyambadi dismissed Riyaz's petition seeking interim custody of his seized NS 200 Pulsar vehicle (Reg.No.TN 18 AW 3870) used in a theft case. The court rejected his plea citing his absence, failure to produce original ownership documents despite sufficient time, and the prosecution's need to retain the vehicle as material evidence to prove the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts