GOVINDASAMY vs MAHALINGAM Advocate - VEERAPANDIYAN N — 22/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U.O.21R32. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTU080026872020
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
155/2020
Filing Date
24-08-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
25-08-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
2-District Munsif, Vaniyambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVINDASAMY
Adv. MURUGAN J
RUKUMANI
Adv. MURUGAN J
VIJAYA
Adv. MURUGAN J
MAHADEVAN
Adv. MURUGAN J
Respondent(s)
MAHALINGAM Advocate - VEERAPANDIYAN N
GOWRI
Adv. VEERAPANDIYAN N
CHANDIRA
Adv. VEERAPANDIYAN N
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Vaniyambadi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
EA Pending
EA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | EA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | EA Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) recorded on 07.02.2023 in the District Munsif Court, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District, in case E.P.22/2020 arising from OS 106/2014. The witness, aged 62, testified regarding a land dispute involving alleged extortion of ₹30,000, property encroachment, and conflicting claims about house demolition and water access rights. The cross-examination covered six substantive points addressing the witness's complaints about intimidation, land boundary disputes, and multiple petitions filed in the matter, with the witness's testimony being recorded under oath per the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) recorded on 07.02.2023 in the District Munsif Court, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District, in case E.P.22/2020 arising from OS 106/2014. The witness, aged 62, testified regarding a land dispute involving alleged extortion of ₹30,000, property encroachment, and conflicting claims about house demolition and water access rights. The cross-examination covered six substantive points addressing the witness's complaints about intimidation, land boundary disputes, and multiple petitions filed in the matter, with the witness's testimony being recorded under oath per the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts