AKBAR KOUSAR S vs THE COMMISSIONER — 12/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U,S,27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTU080000172022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2022
Filing Date
09-02-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
2-District Munsif, Vaniyambadi
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKBAR KOUSAR S
Adv. VARADHARAJAN R V
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER
DHAMODHARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Vaniyambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Court of Vaniyambadi granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff S. Akbar Kausar against Vaniyambadi Municipality and a contractor. Although the court found that the dumping of construction materials on the plaintiff's 10-acre herbal garden property on 07.02.2022 was a bona fide mistake by the contractor's driver (not a deliberate attempt to lay a road), it issued the injunction to protect the plaintiff's lawful possession and prevent future administrative interference. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court of Vaniyambadi granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff S. Akbar Kausar against Vaniyambadi Municipality and a contractor. Although the court found that the dumping of construction materials on the plaintiff's 10-acre herbal garden property on 07.02.2022 was a bona fide mistake by the contractor's driver (not a deliberate attempt to lay a road), it issued the injunction to protect the plaintiff's lawful possession and prevent future administrative interference. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts