BANK OF BARODA, FORMERLY VIJAYA BANK, RAMANAICKENPETAI BRANCH vs SATHIYANATHAN A M Advocate - SAMBATTHU M — 232/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22 and 33(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTU070006192023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
578/2023
Filing Date
16-06-2023
Registration No
232/2023
Registration Date
16-06-2023
Court
Sub Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANK OF BARODA, FORMERLY VIJAYA BANK, RAMANAICKENPETAI BRANCH
Adv. VARADARAJAN R V
Respondent(s)
SATHIYANATHAN A M Advocate - SAMBATTHU M
NITHIYANANDAM M
RAVI K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court judgment with a final decision. It records the sworn testimony of Sathiyaseelan (Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda) given on 24.06.2025 before the Subordinate Judge in Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District in case OS.232/2023, wherein the witness identifies and authenticates various loan documents and agreements dated between 2013-2022. The deposition was recorded, read back to the witness for verification, and the witness provided his signature confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record, not a court judgment with a final decision. It records the sworn testimony of Sathiyaseelan (Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda) given on 24.06.2025 before the Subordinate Judge in Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District in case OS.232/2023, wherein the witness identifies and authenticates various loan documents and agreements dated between 2013-2022. The deposition was recorded, read back to the witness for verification, and the witness provided his signature confirming its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts