SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO Ltd By J Silambarasan vs B THIRUNAUKARASU — 20/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR 21 R 38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTU070004282024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
09-08-2024
Filing Number
306/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Vaniyambadi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO Ltd By J Silambarasan
Adv. Raghavan s
Respondent(s)
B THIRUNAUKARASU
R Nagendiran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 02-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 02-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 24-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 19-09-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a deposition of witness document, not a court order with a substantive ruling. Witness Silambarasan (PW1) in case EP.No.20/2024 before the Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District, solemnly affirmed his examination-in-chief statement on 10.03.2026 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to him, confirmed as correct, and he affixed his signature/thumb impression to the deposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a deposition of witness document, not a court order with a substantive ruling. Witness Silambarasan (PW1) in case EP.No.20/2024 before the Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District, solemnly affirmed his examination-in-chief statement on 10.03.2026 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to him, confirmed as correct, and he affixed his signature/thumb impression to the deposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts