NAGARAJI K vs SIVALINGAM Advocate - RANJITHKUMAR — 179/2021

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 22nd April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTU070004282021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

464/2021

Filing Date

27-07-2021

Registration No

179/2021

Registration Date

12-08-2021

Court

Sub Court, Vaniyambadi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25(b)
IA/1/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section NAGARAJI KSIVALINGAM
IA/2/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section SIVALINGAMNAGARAJI K
IA/3/2026 Classification : 151 Petition Section SIVALINGAMNAGARAJI K

Petitioner(s)

NAGARAJI K

Adv. LOGANATHAN R

Respondent(s)

SIVALINGAM Advocate - RANJITHKUMAR

GANESAN

Adv. RANJITHKUMAR

MUNIRATHINAM

Adv. RANJITHKUMAR

KRISHNAMURTHY

Adv. KAMALAKANNAN S

Murugesan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi

22-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Judgement

06-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary This is a cross-examination transcript (OS No. 179/2021) dated 06.03.2026 of defendant witness Krishnamurthy recorded by the Subordinate Judge at Vaniyambadi. The witness testified regarding disputed property boundaries, denying allegations of encroachment on 30 cents of land, disputing claims about document creation by Nagarajan, and clarifying boundary issues related to Survey No. 144, while the court recorded his affirmation of the testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a cross-examination transcript (OS No. 179/2021) dated 06.03.2026 of defendant witness Krishnamurthy recorded by the Subordinate Judge at Vaniyambadi. The witness testified regarding disputed property boundaries, denying allegations of encroachment on 30 cents of land, disputing claims about document creation by Nagarajan, and clarifying boundary issues related to Survey No. 144, while the court recorded his affirmation of the testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Vaniyambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case