UNION BANK OF INDIA, JAFFRABAD BRANCH vs LAKSHMANAN N — 95/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTU070003142022

Arguments

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

331/2022

Filing Date

21-04-2022

Registration No

95/2022

Registration Date

22-04-2022

Court

Sub Court, Vaniyambadi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 26
IA/1/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section UNION BANK OF INDIA, JAFFRABAD BRANCHLAKSHMANAN N
IA/2/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section LAKSHMANAN NUNION BANK OF INDIA, JAFFRABAD BRANCH

Petitioner(s)

UNION BANK OF INDIA, JAFFRABAD BRANCH

Adv. VARADARAJAN R V

Respondent(s)

LAKSHMANAN N

CHINNATHAMBI E

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Vaniyambadi

20-04-2026

Arguments

16-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

For further Proceedings

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: This is a deposition of witness Tirupathi (age 43) recorded on 13.03.2026 in OS.No.95/2022 before the Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District. During examination-in-chief, the witness stated he gave his testimony voluntarily. During cross-examination, the witness denied personally borrowing any money from the plaintiff and claimed to have no knowledge of specific dates or details regarding loan repayment or interest rates. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its correctness before signing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a deposition of witness Tirupathi (age 43) recorded on 13.03.2026 in OS.No.95/2022 before the Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi, Tirupattur District. During examination-in-chief, the witness stated he gave his testimony voluntarily. During cross-examination, the witness denied personally borrowing any money from the plaintiff and claimed to have no knowledge of specific dates or details regarding loan repayment or interest rates. The witness's statement was recorded, read back to him, and he acknowledged its correctness before signing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Vaniyambadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case