THENMOZHI vs SRINIVASAN M — 99/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTU040002242023

Filing Number

133/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

99/2023

Registration Date

10-Jul-2023

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur

Judge

4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THENMOZHI

    Adv. SIVAKUMAR S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRINIVASAN M

  2. 2.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER

    Adv. SUGANYA AASAITHAMBI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to two petitioners injured in a May 17, 2023 collision when a car driven negligently by the 1st respondent struck their two-wheeler. The tribunal awarded Rs. 3,24,940/- to the first petitioner and Rs. 2,50,523/- to the second petitioner for medical expenses, disability, pain and suffering, and other heads of damages, while holding the 2nd respondent (insurance company) liable to pay despite the vehicle's expired fitness certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  18. 25-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  19. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  20. 20-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  22. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  23. 19-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  24. 15-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  25. 20-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  26. 22-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  27. 11-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  28. 06-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  29. 14-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  30. 27-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  31. 11-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  32. 04-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  33. 23-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  34. 05-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  35. 18-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  36. 05-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  37. 17-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  38. 04-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  39. 08-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  40. 04-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  41. 29-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  42. 30-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  43. 04-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  44. 12-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  45. 19-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  46. 11-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  47. 24-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  48. 21-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  49. 18-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  50. 20-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  51. 07-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  52. 12-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  53. 27-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  54. 10-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to two petitioners injured in a May 17, 2023 collision when a car driven negligently by the 1st respondent struck their two-wheeler. The tribunal awarded Rs. 3,24,940/- to the first petitioner and Rs. 2,50,523/- to the second petitioner for medical expenses, disability, pain and suffering, and other heads of damages, while holding the 2nd respondent (insurance company) liable to pay despite the vehicle's expired fitness certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case