THENMOZHI vs SRINIVASAN M — 99/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTU040002242023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
133/2023
Filing Date
06-07-2023
Registration No
99/2023
Registration Date
10-07-2023
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur
Judge
4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THENMOZHI
Adv. SIVAKUMAR S
Respondent(s)
SRINIVASAN M
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER
Adv. SUGANYA AASAITHAMBI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Disposed
Orders
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to two petitioners injured in a May 17, 2023 collision when a car driven negligently by the 1st respondent struck their two-wheeler. The tribunal awarded Rs. 3,24,940/- to the first petitioner and Rs. 2,50,523/- to the second petitioner for medical expenses, disability, pain and suffering, and other heads of damages, while holding the 2nd respondent (insurance company) liable to pay despite the vehicle's expired fitness certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to two petitioners injured in a May 17, 2023 collision when a car driven negligently by the 1st respondent struck their two-wheeler. The tribunal awarded Rs. 3,24,940/- to the first petitioner and Rs. 2,50,523/- to the second petitioner for medical expenses, disability, pain and suffering, and other heads of damages, while holding the 2nd respondent (insurance company) liable to pay despite the vehicle's expired fitness certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts