NAGARANI U vs MAHESWARI C Advocate - KHALEEL T E — 157/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTU040001722025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
172/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
157/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur
Judge
4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGARANI U
Adv. VIJAYAKUMAR A V
ULAGARAJ
Respondent(s)
MAHESWARI C Advocate - KHALEEL T E
THE GENERAL MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 27.03.2026 recording witness examination testimony under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1959. The witness, Kailasam, testified about a two-wheeler accident involving the deceased Pushparaj, describing the collision between two vehicles on a single-lane road and his role in calling for ambulance assistance. The court accepted the witness's sworn statement as truthful and admissible evidence for the motor accident compensation case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 27.03.2026 recording witness examination testimony under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1959. The witness, Kailasam, testified about a two-wheeler accident involving the deceased Pushparaj, describing the collision between two vehicles on a single-lane road and his role in calling for ambulance assistance. The court accepted the witness's sworn statement as truthful and admissible evidence for the motor accident compensation case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts