M Dhanapal vs Chelladurai — 80/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTU040000802025

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

80/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2025

Registration No

80/2025

Registration Date

29-04-2025

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur

Judge

4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,

Petitioner(s)

M Dhanapal

Adv. GUNASEKARAN K A

Respondent(s)

Chelladurai

Reliance general Insurance co.Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

24-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: The Special Bench (Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal) at Tiruppattur, in MCOP No. 80/2025 dated 06.04.2026, examined testimony regarding whether a driver's license was issued to the respondent. The court found that the Traffic Department records show "No D.L" (no driver's license) was issued to the respondent as of the date of inquiry, though the possibility exists that a license may have been obtained before 2012 or renewed without the department's knowledge. The court admitted cross-examination testimony noting that the search in computer records showed "No Search Details Found," and acknowledged potential gaps in documentation, but maintained that based on available official records, the respondent had no valid driver's license at the relevant time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Bench (Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal) at Tiruppattur, in MCOP No. 80/2025 dated 06.04.2026, examined testimony regarding whether a driver's license was issued to the respondent. The court found that the Traffic Department records show "No D.L" (no driver's license) was issued to the respondent as of the date of inquiry, though the possibility exists that a license may have been obtained before 2012 or renewed without the department's knowledge. The court admitted cross-examination testimony noting that the search in computer records showed "No Search Details Found," and acknowledged potential gaps in documentation, but maintained that based on available official records, the respondent had no valid driver's license at the relevant time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case