USHA vs MS TRANSYSTEM LOGISTICS INTERNATION (P) lTD., — 14/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(A). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 24th April 2026 Date Not Updated.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTU040000142026
Next Hearing
24th April 2026 Date Not Updated
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
08-09-2016
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur
Judge
4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
USHA
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
MINOR SNEKHA
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
MINOR JEEVITHA
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
MINOR NAVEENKUMAR
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
PAPPAIYAN
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
ANURADHA
Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G
Respondent(s)
MS TRANSYSTEM LOGISTICS INTERNATION (P) lTD.,
IFFCO - TOKI O GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur
Appearance
Appearance
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Appearance | |
| 06-04-2026 | Appearance | |
| 30-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 26-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 24-03-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 11.03.2026 in case MCOP No. 14/2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Mrs. Sangeeta regarding a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner contested claims of marriage to the deceased in 2012, asserting she was not his legitimate spouse and therefore not entitled to compensation. The court accepted the respondents' (deceased's parents and legal heirs) counter-arguments and found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated, determining she has no legal claim to compensation benefits under motor accident law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 11.03.2026 in case MCOP No. 14/2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Mrs. Sangeeta regarding a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner contested claims of marriage to the deceased in 2012, asserting she was not his legitimate spouse and therefore not entitled to compensation. The court accepted the respondents' (deceased's parents and legal heirs) counter-arguments and found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated, determining she has no legal claim to compensation benefits under motor accident law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts