USHA vs MS TRANSYSTEM LOGISTICS INTERNATION (P) lTD., — 14/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(A). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 24th April 2026 Date Not Updated.

Appearance Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTU040000142026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

08-Sep-2016

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with MCOP cases, Tirupathur

Judge

4-Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.USHA

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

  2. 2.MINOR SNEKHA

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

  3. 3.MINOR JEEVITHA

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

  4. 4.MINOR NAVEENKUMAR

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

  5. 5.PAPPAIYAN

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

  6. 6.ANURADHA

    Adv. GNANASEKARAN K G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MS TRANSYSTEM LOGISTICS INTERNATION (P) lTD.,

  2. 2.IFFCO - TOKI O GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 11.03.2026 in case MCOP No. 14/2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Mrs. Sangeeta regarding a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner contested claims of marriage to the deceased in 2012, asserting she was not his legitimate spouse and therefore not entitled to compensation. The court accepted the respondents' (deceased's parents and legal heirs) counter-arguments and found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated, determining she has no legal claim to compensation benefits under motor accident law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  12. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  13. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Special Subordiante Judge (MACT),Thirupattur

  15. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 08-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order from Tiruppattur dated 11.03.2026 in case MCOP No. 14/2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Mrs. Sangeeta regarding a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner contested claims of marriage to the deceased in 2012, asserting she was not his legitimate spouse and therefore not entitled to compensation. The court accepted the respondents' (deceased's parents and legal heirs) counter-arguments and found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated, determining she has no legal claim to compensation benefits under motor accident law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case