B Jasankar vs R Bakthavachalam — 2185/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020193772023
e-Filing Number
09-12-2023
Filing Number
19372/2023
Filing Date
18-12-2023
Registration No
2185/2023
Registration Date
27-12-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B Jasankar
Adv. Siva Kumar
Respondent(s)
R Bakthavachalam
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court I in Tirupathur convicted the accused Bakthavachalam under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 2,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt after the accused failed to provide credible evidence rebutting the presumption of a legally enforceable debt; the accused's bare denials and unsubstantiated claims about repayment were rejected. The accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 3,75,000 within two months, with an additional two-month default imprisonment if unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court I in Tirupathur convicted the accused Bakthavachalam under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 2,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt after the accused failed to provide credible evidence rebutting the presumption of a legally enforceable debt; the accused's bare denials and unsubstantiated claims about repayment were rejected. The accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 3,75,000 within two months, with an additional two-month default imprisonment if unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts