Prabakaran vs Parthiban — 1939/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 and 142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTU020143762024

Evidence

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

18-11-2024

Filing Number

13995/2024

Filing Date

28-10-2024

Registration No

1939/2024

Registration Date

26-12-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138 and 142
MP/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section ParthibanPrabakaran
MP/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Prabakaran

Petitioner(s)

Prabakaran

Adv. SATHYA C

Respondent(s)

Parthiban

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur

26-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

17-02-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

13-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Tirupattur (Case No. STC.No. 1939/2024), dated March 10, 2026. The complainant (a 40-year-old businessman from Tirupattur) testified about receiving a cheque for ₹7,00,000 from the accused dated October 1, 2024, and produced supporting documents including bank correspondence and legal notices. The case has been adjourned to allow for cross-examination of the witness by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Tirupattur (Case No. STC.No. 1939/2024), dated March 10, 2026. The complainant (a 40-year-old businessman from Tirupattur) testified about receiving a cheque for ₹7,00,000 from the accused dated October 1, 2024, and produced supporting documents including bank correspondence and legal notices. The case has been adjourned to allow for cross-examination of the witness by the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case