NEDUMARAN M S vs SALEEM — 1935/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 318 (2) & 318(4). Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020141222024
e-Filing Number
15-11-2024
Filing Number
13741/2024
Filing Date
16-12-2024
Registration No
1935/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
Police Station
THIRUPATHUR TOWN
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEDUMARAN M S
Adv. NARESHBABU
Respondent(s)
SALEEM
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate I, Tirupathur convicted the accused Saleem under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 8,00,000 that was dishonored. The court found that the accused admitted to the cheque's signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting his defense that the cheque was issued for a joint plywood business. The accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 10,00,000 within two months, with a default sentence of two additional months imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate I, Tirupathur convicted the accused Saleem under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 8,00,000 that was dishonored. The court found that the accused admitted to the cheque's signature and failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting his defense that the cheque was issued for a joint plywood business. The accused was sentenced to six months simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 10,00,000 within two months, with a default sentence of two additional months imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts