KARUNANITHY D vs VENKATARAMANA BABU S Advocate - JAGADESAN B — 1455/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138149. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020133532021
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13347/2021
Filing Date
28-12-2021
Registration No
1455/2021
Registration Date
28-12-2021
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARUNANITHY D
Adv. KHALEEL T E
Respondent(s)
VENKATARAMANA BABU S Advocate - JAGADESAN B
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 19-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: S.T.C.NO.1455/2021 | Date: 12.02.2025 This is a cross-examination transcript in a Tamil Nadu civil/money dispute case where witness P.Sa.1 Karunanathi (age 40) testified regarding monetary transactions with the opposing party. The witness testified about lending Rs. 3,50,000 to the opposing party (claimed to be a close friend) without documented agreements, receiving Rs. 17 lakhs as railway settlement in 2017, and maintaining that he conducted no illegal moneylending activities. The court recorded the witness's statement and cross-examination, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: S.T.C.NO.1455/2021 | Date: 12.02.2025 This is a cross-examination transcript in a Tamil Nadu civil/money dispute case where witness P.Sa.1 Karunanathi (age 40) testified regarding monetary transactions with the opposing party. The witness testified about lending Rs. 3,50,000 to the opposing party (claimed to be a close friend) without documented agreements, receiving Rs. 17 lakhs as railway settlement in 2017, and maintaining that he conducted no illegal moneylending activities. The court recorded the witness's statement and cross-examination, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts