PRITHIVIRAJAN R vs DHAYALAN M — 1038/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 142. Status: CMP Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020129392022
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12933/2022
Filing Date
08-11-2022
Registration No
1038/2022
Registration Date
08-11-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRITHIVIRAJAN R
Adv. ARUNACHALAM S
Respondent(s)
DHAYALAN M
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
CMP Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | CMP Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of a witness (Prabhakar, age 48) in case STC No. 1038/2022 dated 07.02.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppattur. The witness, who is the accused in a loan-related dispute, testifies that he and the defendant jointly borrowed ₹3 lakhs from the complainant, with his share being ₹1 lakh, and claims to have repaid this amount and returned cheques and bonds given as security. The court records the witness's testimony regarding the loan transaction, repayment, and recovery of securities, with the witness denying allegations of misappropriation and maintaining his version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of a witness (Prabhakar, age 48) in case STC No. 1038/2022 dated 07.02.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppattur. The witness, who is the accused in a loan-related dispute, testifies that he and the defendant jointly borrowed ₹3 lakhs from the complainant, with his share being ₹1 lakh, and claims to have repaid this amount and returned cheques and bonds given as security. The court records the witness's testimony regarding the loan transaction, repayment, and recovery of securities, with the witness denying allegations of misappropriation and maintaining his version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts